HRIS is Not a Drive-Thru
- Dani from Texas

- Aug 5
- 2 min read
Stop taking orders. Start leading the system.
Dani from Texas reporting back from the TOLA RUG (Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Arkansas), and the Customer Sharing Movement (CSM) Sharing Café,...
In last week's Sharing Café poll, we offered four choices:

Two themes surfaced from this poll:
Interruptions
Politics
At TOLA, we talked about it head-on. HRIS professionals are tired of being pinged constantly, deprioritized repeatedly, and asked to deliver strategy without the space to build it.
You can’t run a roadmap if your day is a Slack feed of “quick asks.” That’s why it's important to rebuild the way we work.
But before diving in…look at this Workday crew at the TOLA RUG in Dallas!!!
A ton of Workday experience all in one room:

Politics is a System Problem, not a People Problem
HRIS struggles with politics more than we would like to admit:
Competing priorities
Leadership opinions dressed as requirements
We've all been there.
Here’s the truth most teams avoid: The best way to combat politics is with process.
A robust intake form is harder to argue with than your gut.
A scoring system gives you backup when someone “just wants it done.”
Governance isn’t red tape. It’s armor.
When your process is respected, you don’t have to fight as hard to be respected.
Step 1: Define the Work
We tracked everything:
Slack pings
Tickets
Meetings
Approvals
Fire drills
70% percent of our time was spent reacting, not delivering.
So, we redefined the work into three categories:
Tasks
Low-effort, low-impact
Example: Pulling one-off reports or helping with errors
Projects
Require testing, configuration, and cross-functional input
Example: Launching Workday Assistant, building new comp letters
Steady-State
Recurring cycles that return every quarter or year
Example: Open enrollment, comp reviews, Workday releases
Want to see how we structured it? Dive into the video!
Once we named the work, we could start protecting time for what mattered.
Step 2: Score the Politics Out
Not all work is equal. And we stopped pretending it was. We introduced a scoring model with five criteria:

Since you will find 90% of projects fall into “important” get ready to force rank within that category.
We scored based off criticality, company goals, effort, risk, and visibility.
The score wasn’t just a number. It was our shield.
Suddenly, politics had a process to answer to.
Step 3: Govern with Intention
Governance doesn’t stall progress.
Lack of governance does.
What we implemented:
A non-negotiable intake form
A cross-functional review rhythm
Executive ownership from CHRO or CIO
Governance doesn’t mean projects need to get complicated. But it does mean slowing down to redefine how you work.
TL;DR? Here’s ideas of what you can do tomorrow to combat politics and constant disruptions:
Achieve one thing on your backlog
Say no to a request that skips your intake process
Ask: “what outcome does this support?” If they can’t answer, you already have your answer
Final Thought
HRIS isn’t about saying yes faster.
It’s about building what matters, without burning your team out in the process.
What are your thoughts? Comment below or on my LinkedIn post.
Author: Dani from TX

_edited.png)




Comments